Archive for the ‘Google AdWords’ Category

Profiteering from the collapse of XL? Or shrewd marketing?

Saturday, September 13th, 2008

Within hours of the news that the UK’s third largest package holiday group XL, went into administration yesterday, the above sponsored ads on Google started appearing.

As well as the top 3 ads featured above there were further ads from the likes of Fly BMI, British Airways, Travel Republic and a fair few other online travel agents.

So is it in bad taste? Should other travel operators and airlines try to capitalise on the downfall of one of their competitors? And what about that ad from “The People’s Post Office”? Is it me or do they seem to be gloating? Almost as if to say “Don’t you wish you had booked some travel insurance with us? If you did you wouldn’t be in this mess”.

Or is all fair in love and the Internet? Are the above ads just there to help stranded passengers looking to get home, any way they can?

Personally, I think it’s a fine line to walk. I find the Post Office ad distasteful and it’s put me off ever booking insurance with them. However, the other ads could be seen as offering a useful service to XL customers. I’m particularly impressed by the speed in which Thomson have put together a dedicated landing page.

What do you think?

What I’m listening to right now: John Legend Feat Kanye West – “It’s Over”

Post from: Affiliate Marketing Blog Here.org.uk

Profiteering from the collapse of XL? Or shrewd marketing?

Share This

Original post by Kieron

Free Google AdWords Voucher - £30 free online advertising voucher

Sunday, June 22nd, 2008

£30 free at Google AdWords

Google are running a free £30 voucher promotion to get you started with AdWords. Click here to grab it but hurry as it probably won’t be around for long.

Don’t forget that you can also get a free £50 voucher from Yahoo! Search Marketing too by clicking here.

What I’m listening to right now: N.E.R.D – “You Know What”

Post from: Affiliate Marketing Blog Here.org.uk

Free Google AdWords Voucher - £30 free online advertising voucher

Share This

Original post by Kieron

Free Google AdWords Voucher - £30 free online advertising voucher

Sunday, June 22nd, 2008

£30 free at Google AdWords

Google are running a free £30 voucher promotion to get you started with AdWords. Click here to grab it but hurry as it probably won’t be around for long.

Don’t forget that you can also get a free £50 voucher from Yahoo! Search Marketing too by clicking here.

What I’m listening to right now: N.E.R.D – “You Know What”

Post from: Affiliate Marketing Blog Here.org.uk

Free Google AdWords Voucher - £30 free online advertising voucher

Share This

Original post by Kieron

PPC Split Testing: Reducing Risk When Testing New Ads Against Control

Thursday, May 22nd, 2008

Testing New PPC AdsThis is the final installment of our PPC copywriting series. Part one discussed the importance of unique selling propositions in ad copy to communicate why a customer should buy from you rather than competitors. We followed this up with strategies for continual ad copy split testing. Today’s post assumes you’ve found a clear winning ad by testing one variable at a time, and you now want to test it against radically different copy.

I learned of this tip through a fantastic free video from Stompernet explaining the AdWords Triangulation Method (38:50 minutes through the video).

Here’s the danger in testing a winning ad (as your control) against experimental copy - if your new creative is a dud, you could lose 25-50% of your click through rate potential if your ads are showing evenly, depending on how many ads you’re testing.

A smarter approach recommended by Stompernet is to create 4 identical copies of your control ad, and one test ad. This ensures that your “safe” ad will show 80% of the time, and your test ad only 20%. Plus, the control ad’s solid click through history will cause it to rank at higher positions than brand new ads, so creating new copies reduces this bias.

I think you could also pause the control ad, and create 4 new copies to eliminate the bias altogether. But it’s nice to have one copy that’s going to achieve better positions at lower click through rates, especially if you’re continually testing. If you can tolerate more risk, you could create just one copy of your control so you’re running 3 ads - 66% of the time you’re running your control copy, 33% of the time you’re getting higher positions and lower CPC from the click through history of the established ad, and 33% is your experimental ad. Then you can segment out the control ad with the history to compare performance of your control copy vs. new copy, without the ranking bias.

9 Ecommerce Innovations: What’s Now &amp What’s Next
Free webinar: June 19th, 2008, 9am PT/12pm ET
Guest Panelist: Jason Billingsley, VP Innovation, Elastic Path Software
Register to Attend

Original post by Linda Bustos

Travel industry not happy with Google AdWords policy changes: Teletext initiate legal proceedings against Directline Holidays

Wednesday, May 21st, 2008

Well it had to happen sooner rather than later.

First of all Ian McCraig, the chief exec of Lastminute.com threatened Google with legal action over their recent decision to allow trademarked keyword bidding here in the UK.

Then Teletext holidays issue a legal threat against any travel company bidding on their brand name. And now Teletext start actual legal proceedings against Directline Holidays for doing exactly that.

Earlier this month, Google spoke to Travolution and stated that their new policy is legally sound.

Google said:

“We conducted a full legal and business review in the UK and Ireland before we made this change.”

“We are confident that our policy is compliant with UK & Irish law.”

So looks like we have interesting times ahead. A quick search on Google tonight for “teletext” shown only official teletext ads, so it looks as if a few people are being careful. Rightly so.

I’ll be watching this case with interest, if it goes to court and Teletext win they it will undoubtedly open the floodgates for thousands of other claims. After all, the sponsored search results are awash with companies bidding on their competitors names and trademarks. But is it legal? Well I’m not a lawyer so am not qualified to answer that question.

But one thing that does bother me is that Google are always banging on about giving users the search results they really want that are relevant and specific. Fine, so can somebody explain to me how a user searching for say “Thomas Cook” will find ads for rival travel agents relevant?? Surely the simple fact that I typed in the name of a well known travel agent/site means that’s what I am searching for?

Update: Just searched and looks like TravelSupermarket.com are trying their luck with Teletext!

Thanks to Chris for the tip on this story.

What I’m listening to right now: Ashanti Feat Nelly & Akon – “Body On Me”

Post from: Affiliate Marketing Blog Here.org.uk

Travel industry not happy with Google AdWords policy changes: Teletext initiate legal proceedings against Directline Holidays

Share This

Original post by Kieron

PPC Copywriting: The Evolution of a PPC Split Test

Wednesday, May 21st, 2008

Spoof Adwords AdYesterday we talked about persuasive copywriting for PPC ads, and as promised, today we’re going to talk about strategies for split testing ads.

I’ve heard most PPC experts recommend you test headlines first, because they are most visible and are believed to influence click through rate more than body copy (because people have a tendency not to read things if they don’t have to). But I’m going to go against the gurus and suggest how you could test offers and value propositions first, using a hypothetical campaign for “wireless headphones.”

The Strategy

This approach uses Dynamic Keyword Insertion in headlines for your first few rounds of testing. You have more room to market yourself in ad copy than in the headline. You can test offers, calls to action, value propositions — copy that answers the question “why should I buy from your site?”

Dynamic Keyword Insertion means Google will match your headline to the searcher’s query. If Jimmy searches for “wireless head phones” or “cordless headphones” the ad would adjust itself accordingly for maximum relevance so long as that keyword is in your Ad Group and fits in the headline. If Jimmy searches “I’m looking for killer wireless headphones” (a long tail term), as long as “wireless headphones” is broad or phrase matched, a default keyword would display as the headline. In this case, simply “wireless headphones.” You’ll see an example of how to use this feature in the first screenshot, or read more in Google’s DKI tutorial.

But we’re not going to use keyword insertion in the ad text - there’s no need to keyword stuff. We want as much space for testing compelling offers, not redundant keywords. It’s not SEO, it’s not the year 2001 and we speak English here. Here’s an example of totally useless keyword repetition (real ad):

Keyword Stuffed PPC Ad

Alright, let’s get started with a hypothetical example of 5 rounds of PPC ad testing:

Round 1

First you’re going to pick 2-4 versions of an ad to run evenly against each other.

Headline: Use DKI for your headline

Ad Copy Line 2: Make sure you have your best unique value proposition included in the ad. I recommend using it as your second line, and using the top line as your testing line. A unique value proposition is the most compelling strength or offer you as a retailer have that sets you apart. If you offer free shipping, free returns, flat-rate shipping, no hassle returns, money back guarantees, have won awards, or anything else that builds trust or adds value - use it!

Ad Copy Line 1: Here’s where you microtest your ad. Many tests have found including numbers - whether a price, percentage or otherwise makes your ad stand out and improves click through. If you offer low prices, it may make your ad more attractive than others. If you want to deter bargain shoppers, a higher price can save you money on clicks and improve your conversion rate. You could here test price vs. non-price, but for this example, we’re going to test variations of showing a price.

Display URL: Some advertisers use dynamic keyword insertion at the end of the display URL (so long as it fits) to boost the keyword relevance, and it may or may not improve click through. An argument could be made that shorter URLs have higher click through. Also, www and non-www URLs may be tested. You really need to test this yourself, but not in round one. If you have too many variables in your testing, you won’t know whether it’s the ad text or the display URL that’s performing better.

In round one, we’re going to use www URLs for every ad variation, with capitalization, as there has been many studies that do suggest this gets higher click through. Since I want to play it safe here, we’re going to always use capitalization in every round.

Okay, here are the ads we’re starting off with - but there’s an error, can you spot it?

Round 1 Testing

Answer: We’re testing pricing offers, so we want all else to be identical. We can test “name brands” in a later round.

Don’t forget to edit your campaign settings and select “show ads more evenly” so you can properly split-test.

Now we get to make up some results. Let’s say that “$29.99 and Up” had low click through rate of 0.41%, but the other two versions had 3.0% and 3.72%. And let’s assume a quick check with SplitTester.com’s confidence tool declared “From $29.99″ the statistical winner. Before you decide it’s a winner, make sure that it also has a good conversion rate - that these clicks end up buying. You don’t want to pick an ad only costs you money and doesn’t make you any.

If you have an ad that rocks click through rate AND conversion rate, you can move on to round 2.

Round 2

Pause the ads that didn’t “win,” and let’s ad new ads to test. If you delete your ads, you’ll never be able to see their history again.

Now I want to know the impact of URL versions as follows:

Round 2 Testing

I’m going to pretend that the non-www, non-trailing keyword version performed best. On to round 3…

Round 3

I’m trying out more creative copy in the first line. I want to know what seems to be most compelling about wireless headphones. Is it range and clarity of sound? Is it better bass? Is it cool styles? Are name brands important?

Round 3 Testing

OK, again, totally arbitrary - let’s assume the test resulted in “Stylish, Wicked Bass” as the winning creative. Can this be further tweaked?

Round 4

Round 4 Testing

At this point (or in any round), there might not be a clear winner. You might want to keep testing different micro-variations until you get a definite star ad before you move onto the next round - testing headlines. Or, you might decide that they’re all performing decent and you can choose one you like best and move on to the next stage.

Round 5

Now I’m ready to test headlines. There are common modifiers PPC advertisers will use in headlines - the ones I’ve seen most are:

  • unique

  • discount
  • cool
  • cheap
  • find
  • buy
  • compare
  • on sale
  • sale
  • save on
  • for less
  • get
  • need [keyword]?
  • reviews
  • [brand] [keyword]
  • [keyword] [country]

You might want to try these, but remember that once you add the bargain hunter modifiers, you could attract clicks you don’t want (that’s why including price, even if higher than competitors helps). But definitely avoid testing different brand names. Unless they are doing specific branded search, you don’t want to use brand names in your headline. It makes your selection seem too restricted like you only offer one brand (less selection) or you have made a decision for them. Unless the searcher is familiar with the brand, it’s not effective. Your branded products should have their own Ad Groups, anyway.

If you’ve had a clear winning ad copy in previous rounds, you might want to inject these words into your headline, or try your unique value proposition in the headline, like “$0 Shipping” to stand out. Just make sure you’re not wasting ad copy by repeating your offer again in the lines of text. And use your dynamic keyword insertion headline as the “control” version - you want to see if headline variations outperform it.

Here’s an example test, can you spot the error?

Round 5 Testing

If you noticed that one of the ads does not have “wireless headphones” in the ad text or headline, you’re correct. You don’t want to sacrifice keyword relevance for catchy headlines. Double check your ad text, it’s easy to forget the details.

Conclusion

Again, there are many ways you can approach your testing, this is just an example of how you could go about it. This strategy involves testing micro-changes. You can also test really different copy against each other. Tomorrow we’re going to show you how to reduce your risk when doing such tests.

Until tomorrow, here are the key points:

1. Keep testing. You can always “beat the control” - so long as you keep trying.
2. Don’t test more than one variable at a time.
3. Use your unique value propositions whenever you can.
4. Use prices when it makes sense, or other numbers.
5. Use SplitTester.com to check if your test has produced a winner or not.
6. Don’t make your decision based on click through rate alone. Make sure the ad converts.
7. Capitalize The First Letters of Your Words And URLs, It Is A Proven Strategy.
8. Avoid using brand names in headlines unless your ad group and landing page are targeted to only that brand.
9. Triple check your work for spelling and other errors. Make sure your landing pages are tied up correctly.
10. Keep reading Get Elastic for more tips for online marketing. Subscribe if you haven’t already!

9 Ecommerce Innovations: What’s Now &amp What’s Next
Free webinar: June 19th, 2008, 9am PT/12pm ET
Guest Panelist: Jason Billingsley, VP Innovation, Elastic Path Software
Register to Attend

Original post by Linda Bustos

PPC Advertising: Are You Selling Yourself In Your Ads?

Tuesday, May 20th, 2008

PPC Rockstar CopyWith PPC, unless you’ve tapped into niche long-tail keywords your search ads compete with 20 other links per search result page (organic and paid ads) - or even more if you count Google Maps or Google Shopping results.

And often the products and offers are so similar between retailers, what makes a shopper ultimately buy is which retailer he or she prefers.

That’s why you should include some statement that explains why someone should buy from you in your ad copy. You’re not just selling the product, you are selling yourself as a retailer. Most ads don’t do this at all, they just focus on the product.

What if Ads Were Ranked By Persuasion?

Let’s have a look at search ads for “coffee mugs.” If you search for this and refresh the page a few times, you’ll notice results bounce around quite a bit (we’ll explain why this is later). The left screenshot is how Google really ranked the ads when I performed the search, and the right side how I would rank the ads by effectiveness.

Results by GoogleResults if Ranked By Persuasion

Now let’s deconstruct the ads:

(more…)

9 Ecommerce Innovations: What’s Now & What’s Next
Free webinar: June 19th, 2008, 9am PT/12pm ET
Guest Panelist: Jason Billingsley, VP Innovation, Elastic Path Software
Register to Attend

Original post by Linda Bustos

Webinar Recap: The Key to PPC for Online Retailers

Thursday, May 15th, 2008

Paid Search ImageThanks again to Ryan Gibson from the Rimm-Kaufman Group for sharing some top-notch tips on paid search. If you missed the call, we will be posting the full length replay on the Elastic Path website. Until then, here’s a recap of the main points:

Keyword Development is 50% of Your Success

Keyword research is essential because it ultimately determines which searches your ads will appear for. Keywords must be appropriate, specific and capture the variations of how people search for the products you sell.

“Long tail” terms are desirable. Although they don’t get a lot of clicks, there is not much competition and it’s the specificity that makes them high-converting. You can also get them low-cost, and the lower the cost, the lower the risk. You’re not spending anything unless they are clicked on. Long tail terms in aggregate may be attracting a small percentage of clicks but be driving the highest number of sales because they convert highly.

General (and shorter) queries may indicate one is in research stage and thus, convert lower than more specific searches, when customers are aware of exactly what they are looking for.

Keyword List Tips

Test 3-10 Keywords per SKU

Modifiers don’t count, such as “buy widgets” or “buy widgets online.” Also, branded terms don’t count. Rather, you want to test out unique terms. So start with a URL (product page, right down to the sku - so if you sell blue and red widgets, they have their own keywords, as do different sizes). 2 benefits to this approach are:

1. Ensures you have the product you’re creating the term for
2. Makes it easier to tie up correct landing pages

(more…)

9 Ecommerce Innovations: What’s Now & What’s Next
Free webinar: June 19th, 2008, 9am PT/12pm ET
Guest Panelist: Jason Billingsley, VP Innovation, Elastic Path Software
Register to Attend

Original post by Linda Bustos

Google Shaking Up URLs in Search Ads?

Thursday, April 24th, 2008

Google Shake UpWhile in London this week, Jason Billingsley spotted something different in Google search results.

If you look closely, you’ll notice the display URL in Adwords ads are above the ad copy, not below. Ad copy also appears on the same line as the display URL in some cases.

I did a quick search in Google Blogs (search within only blogs) to see if anyone has blogged about this yet or may know what’s going on. Over here in Vancouver, I still see the traditional ad display so all I can do is speculate that Google is shakin’ things up and testing the impact of different ad structure.

Adwords URL on Top

Close Up Shot of Google Experiment

Jason also observed that the text appears larger than usual which indicates Google may be testing out new formatting of not only paid search but also organic.

Of course it could be handywork of an internal prankster at Google, or the equivalent to Jason’s computer trying to drive on the opposite side of the road while across the pond. (PS, if you’re wondering what the stars are, that’s a feature of StumbleUpon - you can see which pages have been reviewed and rated by Stumblers, and if one of your friends gave it a “thumb,” that will show up too.)

Anyone have more information on this?

The Key to PPC for Online Retailers
Free webinar: May 15th, 2008, 9am PT/12pm ET
Guest Panelist: Ryan Gibson, Director of Marketing, The Rimm-Kaufman Group
Register to Attend

Original post by Linda Bustos

Guest post from Rob Berrisford

Monday, January 28th, 2008

The following is a guest post from Rob Berrisford as I’m in hospital at the moment:

Reading recently about how EU MP’s are considering tighter controls for online marketing with particular interest on behavioural targeting, I considered how this will affect affiliate marketing.

One of the catalysts for this threat of increased regulation is the merger between Google and DoubleClick. With this acquisition Google now has access to even more information than before, meaning they have some pretty interesting information on a huge chunk of the population. They can track the content of your emails with gmail, the things you search for on Google and now with double click the sites you visit and to a certain extent the things you buy.

So how will this affect Affiliate Marketing?

Well to a certain extent it already does, Google change the search rankings that a user sees depending on their past searches.

From an affiliate point of view it just makes things a little more annoying because you can no longer see where you ad is on the screen unless you use the ad preview tool. This can also cause arguments between affiliates and clients if the terms and conditions of a program state that you can not outbid the client and the affiliate and client have different positions on their screen.

If MP’s rule out behavioural targeting will this have to stop? Will this compromise Google’s algorithm?

Post from: Affiliate Marketing Blog Here.org.uk

Guest post from Rob Berrisford

Share This

Original post by Kieron

Facebook Ads as good as AdWords in 2000? I don’t think so!

Thursday, November 29th, 2007

Search engine marketing blog “Apple Pie & Custard” published an article yesterday entitled “Why Facebook Ads are a Better Opportunity Now than Adwords in 2000

I don’t think I’ve ever disagreed with a statement as strongly as I do with this one. There are lots of reasons for this. but the big obvious glaring reason is this.

If a user is searching on Google for a keyword/keyphrase then by definition they are seeking information, they want to find something out. In other words they are actively looking for information/a product/whatever. Compare it if you will to somebody going to Marks & Spencer in the high street because they like their Belgian chocolate cheesecake from he food hall so they set off to go and look for it and maybe buy some. Btw yum! Do you see my point? By making the effort to type a search phrase into Google then you are showing an intent and desire to seek out information. That’s your mindset, so when you see a Google Ad for the particular product etc. that you are looking for, then you are likely to click on it.

But when you are messing about on Facebook, looking up old friends or sending boozemail to your mates or whatever then you aren’t in the same frame of mind at all. You are about a billion percent (that’s the scientific bit) less likely to click on an ad if you happen to see a banner halfway down the page. And that’s a really big “if”, I mean who clicks on banners these days? Surely we all suffer from banner blindness? I know I do.

To me, its just such a huge mindshift between actively searching and looking for information on Google than happening to chance across a banner on a random Facebook page.

I just can’t comprehend how a search blog like the one above can make such a bizarre comparison between Facebook ads and Google AdWords in 2000? Does anyone else get this?

And just in case Apple Pie & Custard need some more evidence that Facebook Flyers are crap then look here, here, here, here, here and here.

What I’m listening to right now: BlackStreet - “U Blow My Mind”

Share This

Original post by Kieron

Facebook Ads as good as AdWords in 2000? I don’t think so!

Thursday, November 29th, 2007

Search engine marketing blog “Apple Pie & Custard” published an article yesterday entitled “Why Facebook Ads are a Better Opportunity Now than Adwords in 2000

I don’t think I’ve ever disagreed with a statement as strongly as I do with this one. There are lots of reasons for this. but the big obvious glaring reason is this.

If a user is searching on Google for a keyword/keyphrase then by definition they are seeking information, they want to find something out. In other words they are actively looking for information/a product/whatever. Compare it if you will to somebody going to Marks & Spencer in the high street because they like their Belgian chocolate cheesecake from he food hall so they set off to go and look for it and maybe buy some. Btw yum! Do you see my point? By making the effort to type a search phrase into Google then you are showing an intent and desire to seek out information. That’s your mindset, so when you see a Google Ad for the particular product etc. that you are looking for, then you are likely to click on it.

But when you are messing about on Facebook, looking up old friends or sending boozemail to your mates or whatever then you aren’t in the same frame of mind at all. You are about a billion percent (that’s the scientific bit) less likely to click on an ad if you happen to see a banner halfway down the page. And that’s a really big “if”, I mean who clicks on banners these days? Surely we all suffer from banner blindness? I know I do.

To me, its just such a huge mindshift between actively searching and looking for information on Google than happening to chance across a banner on a random Facebook page.

I just can’t comprehend how a search blog like the one above can make such a bizarre comparison between Facebook ads and Google AdWords in 2000? Does anyone else get this?

And just in case Apple Pie & Custard need some more evidence that Facebook Flyers are crap then look here, here, here, here, here and here.

What I’m listening to right now: BlackStreet - “U Blow My Mind”

Share This

Original post by Kieron